Author Topic: Comparing the Combat Arms (Inf vs. Engr vs. Armd vs. Arty)  (Read 76571 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Roko

  • Guest
Hi,

I‘m planning on joining the reserves soon, (something I‘ve been thinking about throughout high school), but I‘m kinda torn between choosing an MOC. I can‘t decide between being a Field Engineer or an Armoured soldier.. (both have reserve units at the local CFB) So... from people who are in these MOCs, especially reservists, what are they each really like? what do you do as a reservist in them?

Also, I‘ll throw in another question.. has anyone taken the 20 weekend part time basic? I wish I‘d joined earlier and taken full time baisc this summer, but I had some other big things that needed to be done this summer, and in the fall I‘m off to Uni.. I‘d like to do basic asap, but am aprehensive about losing 5 months of weekends (no skiing this winter.. aaaaagh!), especially with my studies., and on the other hand don‘t want to wait much longer to join and do basic..

thanks..  :sniper:

Bill Green

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2001, 01:42:00 »
Roko...,

Good on you for checking out both eng and armour.

I am an armoured soldier.  The armour MOC is divided into armour and recce.  In both you start out by taking your QL2 basic course which is common to all Mocs and then you begin to specialize.  You become a crewman and in the armour world you either drive,shoot or load a tank while in the recce world you drive,observe.  In both at some further stage in your training you crewcommand the tank or recce veh (Iltis).

From my own experience I and my unit have done both roles.  As a tanker you stomp around the battlefield area trying to pick a fight with the enemy. As a recce soldier you use stealth and concealment to gain info on the en and ground.  Both require drive, initiative, cunning and guile.

Both have an echelon system to support their call signs c/s in the field(veh and crew).  Again you may drive a supply veh, issue kit, repair veh, cook, clerk or repair weapons/radios and tend wounded.  Some of these tasks are in specialized MOCs like medic but crewman also do the task.

The leadership skills you learn and the field experience you gain will make you a better citizen more confident in your own abilities.  You will also hone team building skills which you can apply to most work places.

And lastly you will be a part of a regimental family where you will count on others and in turn be counted upon.

Engineers are like trolls.You find them on roads, bridges and minefields.  Just kidding..., they are a noble race of soldiers with particular trade and technology skills and you really should talk to one of them about their craft.

It‘s been a long time since I took my recruit course but I still have friends from that course over _ _ years later.  Some swear that if you don‘t do a total immersion you don‘t get all the military culture.  Others claim that weekend work can give you the same challenge.  Go find a soldier in one of the units M/Cpl, Sgt or Warrent Officer and get him or her to advise you as they will know the instructors and leadership cadre and hence the tempo and tone of the course.  Then jump in with both feet.

Good Hunting

BG
Reconnaissance with Courage and Integrity

colgan

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2001, 18:27:00 »
Roko i am not sure where you live but here in southern ont. your ql2 is 16 weeks long and is every other weekend ,so ski on my friend.And what about checking out the backbone of the army the infantry.i am sure there is a unit where you are. :cdn:

Roko

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2001, 19:20:00 »
I‘m near CFB Edmonotn, so there‘s pretty much a unit of everything in the army here.. I‘m also considering infantry, but recently I‘ve been thinking about either engineers or armour more..

I asked the local reserve recruiter, and was told it would last about 20 weekend, but wasn‘t told if it was every weekend or not..

hmmm... :confused:

colgan

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2001, 20:54:00 »
it has to be every other weekend because the ql2 summer course is one month (30 days) so if your fall ql2 course was 20 weeks that would work out to be 60 days (training weekend counts as 3 days from friday at 1800 hrs to sunday at 1900 hrs) so if it was every other weekend that would work out to 10 training sessions or 30 days.  Hope this info helps.  Infantry is the only way to go!! :cdn:

Roko

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #5 on: August 02, 2001, 21:31:00 »
excellent.. every other weekend would work out pretty good.. I think I just might do that.. I‘d prefer to do the summer course, but as I said, I a;ready had some other comitments this summer (*cough* sumo robots for a competition *cough*), and don‘t really want to wait until next summer..

As for the infantry, I‘ve only so far heard bad opinions about it, but those where only from ppl in the service regiment, who, well, weren‘t real soldiers (not sayig that all service ppl aren‘t soldiers, just the people I know..), so I didn‘t really take those ‘opinions‘ into account... (they where about how it was too hard, and you break fingers and stuff, as compared to sitting in a warm truck with a cup of coffee in the service.. one of my reasons for joining the army is a physical challenge, so...)

What has the infantry been like for you?

Also, Bill Green, your info say‘s you‘re a Major.. My question is where you an NCM before becoming an officer, and how did you go about doing it? I‘m going to uni this fall, and am thinking of joining the regular forces as an officer after uni, but want to get a taste for military life, and experience as an NCM (at least in the reserves) before becoming an officer, so I‘m joining the reserves now...

Bill Green

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2001, 23:32:00 »
Roko...,

Started out as a recruit pte took my trades courses then leadership courses and became a senior NCO (Sgt) and then commissioned from the ranks(CFR) to 2/lt. and then took my officer training.  I recommend this route because it allows you to gain the experience of knowing what it is your soldiers are experiencing.  i found that valuable.

You should also know that the CF values education and will assist you at university whether you are a pte or officer.  There is a 2000$ gratuity per year that can be applied to your tuition costs through to your 4 year max degree.  But you must choose to stay in the reserves while in school.  Of course they will also attempt to give you summer employment and of course evening and weekend work Sep to May.

After you have been in awile you will know your way around and you can put in for officer training.  This will take the concurrence of your CO and a PSO interview.

Keep your powder dry and your arm steady.

Roko

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #7 on: August 03, 2001, 00:12:00 »
Wow, that sounds great.. I think I just might do that... the part time basic begins in late fall, so If I‘m going to take that, I guess I‘ll have to decide on an MOC soon, and begin the enlistment process asap..

 :cdn:

Offline RCA

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • 2,370
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 560
  • Grizzled Old Veteran
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #8 on: August 03, 2001, 22:38:00 »
Just to muddy the waters a bit more. Think about the Artillery. You would be joining the one joining one of the most prestigious regiments in the CF, Few others can boast the battle honour of Ubique (Everywhere). Also I know for a fact the new CO of 20 Fd Regt is one of the best around, being ex-Reg F and one of those considered one of the good guys. The old CO was good, but with LCol M. they now have the pull to go places. (this is a good thing).

All arm twisting asiode, what ever MOC/Regt you decide to join, if you have the dedication will become the best in the CF. The is the pull of our Regimental system. buddies, Detachment, Troop, Battery, Regiment, Brigade, Area. And who ever you are with, none is better.

The new QL2 is 20 days long. Whether it will be in effect for this fall , I couldn‘t tell you (one now is 16 days). However which ever unit/garrison you go to find info, find out (ask, they should give you a straight answer) and find out how it is running. every weekend, or alternate.
Ubique

ender

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #9 on: August 06, 2001, 16:42:00 »
I personaly have to say that Engineers are the best. (I‘m biased of course)  Not that I have anything against the armoured or anything, but I became a Sapper because I thought we were the best.  You actually get useful skills and you have to be able to use initiative, but I‘ve elaborated on this elsewhere.

I did a weekend QL2 course and I have to say that it is vastly inferior to a summer course.  It doesn‘t prepare for Gagetown (which is where you go if you are an Engineer) or for any further military training.  However, since you already missed the summer course it is better to take it on weekends than try to do the "superman" (a QL2 course immidiatly followed by a QL3).  A lot of people injure themseleves on those courses and don‘t get to finish the entire thing.  If you do the weekend course though make sure you physically prepare yourself. (ie make sure your P.T. is up to snuff and that your feet are used to walking in combat boots)

Also, the QL2 is shorter now, just this year, I think it‘s 3 weeks or something like that.

Anyway, good luck with you descision.

Roko

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #10 on: August 06, 2001, 22:53:00 »
Yeah, I think I‘m going to go for Engineer.. I think Armour and Infantry are really cool, but you get to do some infantry stuff in Engineering too, as I gather..

I really regret not being able to take my QL2 this summer, and I don‘t really want to put it off until next summer, although I‘m not sure if I‘ll take it part time or not yet..

I think I‘m pretty fit right now.. I‘ve been swimming every day (except when sick) for over 3 years, and have been running o-noff since before then.. (going to start running again regularly.. I can still run 5k at a fairly good clip non stop)

I‘m kinda worried about my upper-body strength, though, since I‘m fairly lean (I prefer the term ‘hydro-dynamic‘ :) and tall. It‘s primarily because I‘ve got small bones, and don‘t really have an excess bodyfat.. I can do more than the minimum of pullups, pushups (twice as many on a good day) and sit-ups as prescribed by the PAR-Q, and can do the run under the ‘superior‘ time..
I‘ve been doing some weight training, although I‘m going to increase my program (it‘s pretty small right now, I‘m giong to add more excersices, reps and sets.. I know what my body can take, so I shouldn‘t injure myself..)

Even though I consider myself in good shape now, I feel I can always improve, especially for the QL2..

ender

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #11 on: August 11, 2001, 07:45:00 »
It‘s more the QL3 you have to worry about, or if you do a QL2 in Gagetown.  We do insane amounts of pushups.  (50 to go to the bathroom, sometimes sets of a 100)  The amount they tell you for recruiting is not adequate at all.

No matter what shape you are in I would still not reccommend doing your 2‘s and 3‘s in one summer.  My friend is a marathon runner and she screwed up her feet and got RTU‘d (returned to unit) off her 3‘s.  Go for the part time 2‘s, less chance of you injuring yourself.  

Is there an Engineer unit in you area?  Check it out if there is.

Offline recceguy

    A Usual Suspect.

  • "Look, I don't know if shooting penguins will help the environment or not. But I do know that the decision shouldn't be in the hands of people who just wanna kill for fun."
  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Myth
  • *
  • 156,772
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 15,303
  • doddering docent to the museum of misanthropy
    • Army.ca
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #12 on: August 11, 2001, 15:42:00 »
Quote
Originally posted by Recce41:
[qb]Well all you Weekend warriors can relax,
 -so add it up 31 weeks. If u get hurt after 4 weeks you should have not bothered joining. The Army is hard work! You are Weak if a week of hard work hurts go back to Mcdonalds.
                     [/qb]

 :rolleyes: It‘s nice to see that superior, condicending attitude is still alive and well the way some regs view the reserves. We don‘t need the gov‘t to get rid of the reserves, just leave it to our full time brothers-in-arms(?). All those deployments we go on, (manning up to 25% of some missions) still leaves us unqualifed to share the same air I guess. :cool:
If I were to live every day as though it were my last, the body count would be staggering

DISCLAIMER - my opinion may cause manginal irritation.

Offline recceguy

    A Usual Suspect.

  • "Look, I don't know if shooting penguins will help the environment or not. But I do know that the decision shouldn't be in the hands of people who just wanna kill for fun."
  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Myth
  • *
  • 156,772
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 15,303
  • doddering docent to the museum of misanthropy
    • Army.ca
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #13 on: August 11, 2001, 22:12:00 »
I may be off a bit on the %, but it does not alter the facts.  A lot of the young, part time soldiers or cadets are looking at reg force fellas posting on this forum. They‘re looking for guidance, assurance and a genuine interest in gaining knowledge. They look to you for that. They likely see your responses as the final word on the subject(s). Comments like yours are not productive. I guess regs don‘t get hurt anymore, let‘s close NDMC and stop sick parades, we can save some money. Oh, and you didn‘t hurt my feelings. You see I‘ve been on both sides of the fence and heard the snivelling from both reg and res about each other and that‘s exactly what it is, snivelling and whining. I‘ve also seen people, from both sides, at least willing to do something to try solve the problems, rather than just slag the opposition, tell them their not worthy and go flip burgers. At least these young people try it on. Hey, it ain‘t for everyone. Not every reg goes from basic to retirement either. Take a pill and relax. Your technical expertise is well appreciated. We have a pretty good time here, try and enjoy it. Valid points are well accepted and debated with enthusiasm. Heck, sometimes we might(?) even admit being wrong. We don‘t need to belittle the efforts of others to make a point. The competition at SOCNET is the place to mindlessly rail at people. It‘s kind of the 22:00 hrs, fri nite, in the snakepit atmosphere of military forums. Rant ends, out. :D

Audax et Celer (1972-75)

PS- still wondering if your the Coyote patrol attachment to my troop for 2 weeks from now.  :cool:
If I were to live every day as though it were my last, the body count would be staggering

DISCLAIMER - my opinion may cause manginal irritation.

Roko

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #14 on: August 13, 2001, 22:07:00 »
I‘ll admit some people I know in the reserves don‘t really care about soldiering, they just care about impressing women, and getting money. they don‘t want to fight for their country.

I‘m thinking of reserving because I want to get my education before I go regular, but don‘t want to enter after uni without some experience. some of my friends are doing this too. I‘ve got a buddy becoming an airforce pilot after uni, and another friend doing DOTP after some years in the reserves and uni.

but then again, right now I‘m even considering entering the reg force for a few years after my first year of uni, then going back to finish it off..

 :bullet: :cdn: :bullet:

Roko

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #15 on: August 13, 2001, 22:13:00 »
guess I‘ll throw in another question.. It was mentioned that the army values education. So, my question now would be what the army provides for reg soldiers who want to go to university (in my case it would be finish). I was talking to a reg force guy recently, and he said there was something after so many years of service, but wasn‘t sure of the details. I know about the ROTP right out of high school, but I‘m not doing that.. I want to be a ‘real soldier‘ (aka. NCM) for a while before going over to the dark side (officerhood).

p.s. not making fun of officers.. I just want to be an NCM first so I know what‘s going on (aka to become a good officer), and so that I don‘t get to be a desk jockey right away.


 :bullet: :cdn: :bullet:

ender

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #16 on: September 07, 2001, 11:53:00 »
Right now there will be a max 2000$ re-embursment for reservists in post-secondary education.  I‘m not too sure about the rules, I think you have to parade with your unit for a year.  This is also affecting how reg force can get an education, especially for NCM‘s.   I have no idea of the details of that because I‘m not reg force, but I‘m sure you can get the information somewhere.

Offline MCG

  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 114,225
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 9,361
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #17 on: September 09, 2001, 21:50:00 »
Quote
Originally posted by Roko:
[qb]. . . but then again, right now I‘m even considering entering the reg force for a few years after my first year of uni, then going back to finish it off.[/qb]

Finish university first.  It is harder to motivate yourself to go back to the life of a student once you have started making money.  I Know too many people who planned to take a year or two off from university, and then never did go back.

As for your questions about Engineers take a look at this Field Engineer Info.

Roko

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #18 on: September 09, 2001, 22:19:00 »
yeah, I‘ve decided to finish my degree first, and to join the reserves whilst in uni.. oh, and I‘ve decided I‘m probably gonna just stick with infantry if I‘ll be in the reserves... If I go reg force after uni, I may switch to armour or sapper then (unless I really like infantry)

Yard Ape

  • Guest
Re: Engineers Vs. Armour
« Reply #19 on: September 10, 2001, 14:11:00 »
Roko, have you read Infantry vs Engineers?

  :cool:  Yard Ape

Cog

  • Guest
Infantry or Engineering?
« Reply #20 on: June 02, 2001, 04:04:00 »
Joining up part time, need to decide. I‘m currently taking engineering at University, but I‘m looking for a challenge and a chance to see if I cut it as a soldier. I‘m going in as a NCM. I have a cousin was in infantry for 12 years (Started out in the Highlanders, where I‘d be going). I‘ve heard a fair bit about the infantry from him and like everything I hear, but I want to shop around first. After reading a bit here, I‘m hearing that as Combat Engineer, I get to do infantry training, plus build bridges & blow stuff up. Sounds like the best of both worlds...

So, any opinions? Should I go Infantry or Combat Engineer?

Disturbance

  • Guest
Re: Infantry or Engineering?
« Reply #21 on: June 02, 2001, 19:12:00 »
hey cog,

I am enrolled in engineering at UBC and in the Seaforth Highlanders as an infanteer.  However my marks suffered as I spent too much time thinking about the forces and various other things other than school which is kinda backwards. I have got more to say so why dont you email me and I will try and help you out aiight.

the patriot

  • Guest
Re: Infantry or Engineering?
« Reply #22 on: June 04, 2001, 12:53:00 »
Not to further confuse you two, but Assault Pioneers  within the infantry do extremely similar work to that of the Combat Engineers (for example the RCR Assault Pioneer Platoon).  Now, with respect to worrying about one‘s marks suffering..... An understanding Chain of Command should take your life as a university student FIRST.  The last thing you want is to be on academic probation and then shown the proverbial door off campus.  I would assume that your Platoon Commander should be sympathetic of this due to the fact that most officers at the reserve level are enrolled university students themselves.  As long as there is a proper flow of communication between you and your superiors (when and if you enlist of course) there shouldn‘t be any other problems.  After that you only have yourself to blame for shoddy time management skills.

-the patriot-   ;)

Grunt031

  • Guest
Re: Infantry or Engineering?
« Reply #23 on: June 05, 2001, 01:40:00 »
Join the infantry...all the others are just there to hand us the saw....

Offline MCG

  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 114,225
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 9,361
Re: Infantry or Engineering?
« Reply #24 on: June 05, 2001, 22:54:00 »
If Infantry is what you want to do most, you should probably join the Infantry.  Combat Engineers do fight as infantry in our secondary role, however time for courses and exercises is constrained in the reserves.  Priority for training goes to Engineer tasks.  

Where are you thinking of joining?  Some Reserve Infantry regiments have pioneer platoons.  As was mentioned they do a lot of tasks similar to the Combat Engineers (but on a .smaller scale).  They will do the Explosives and mine warfare, but they do not do the bridging